Trust & transparency
How we make money
The full, public version of our affiliate economics — what we earn, what we don’t, and which partners we’ve declined to work with and why.
The short version
The GLP Report is free to read. We pay our writers, engineers, and data verification work by earning commissions when readers click through to a GLP-1 telehealth provider and become customers. Those commissions do not change what the reader pays — the rates on our partner pages are the same rates the provider would quote anyone arriving through any channel.
Our editorial rankings are based on a published methodology. They are not influenced by which partners pay us, which partners pay us more, or which partners would like to be ranked higher. Partners that declined to work with us — and partners that we declined — are still included in our comparisons. That’s the core bargain we offer readers, and we don’t break it.
Partners we currently work with
Our active affiliate relationships run through three networks (Katalys, Impact, Awin) and a handful of direct-to-brand programs. A current, specific list sits below; it is refreshed whenever our roster changes and each entry links to our review of that partner.
- Hims & Hers — via Katalys
- Ro — via Katalys
- Henry Meds — via Impact
- Sprout Health — via Katalys
- Zealthy — via Katalys
Partners we’ve declined
Naming this publicly is a trust asset, not a liability. We decline partnerships with providers whose marketing practices we cannot ethically send readers toward. The current named exclusion:
- MEDVi. Offered $300–$500 CPA commission rates. Declined due to documented fake-doctor advertising, fabricated testimonials using stolen Reddit photos, an FDA warning letter, and an active class-action lawsuit alleging snake-oil product claims. No commission rate is worth the reputational or reader-safety exposure of promoting a provider operating that way.
We also decline — categorically — any provider with an active, unresolved FDA warning letter for false or misleading claims; any provider named in a credible consumer-fraud class action; and any provider using AI-generated fake doctors or stolen testimonial imagery in their own advertising. This list will grow over time. Exclusions are added with the rationale publicly stated.
Practices we will never adopt
Specifically so you can hold us to them:
- AI-generated “doctors” or “patients” in content or ads
- Stock-photo or stolen before/after imagery
- Fabricated testimonials or user stories
- Fake scarcity tactics (countdown timers, “only 3 left,” supply-pressure messaging)
- Pre-checked agreement boxes, fine-print disclosures that contradict bold claims, or cloaked affiliate redirects
- Paid reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, or other third-party platforms
Conflicts of interest
The GLP Report is a portfolio property of Local Leverage AI. LLA does not hold equity in, sit on the board of, or otherwise have a financial stake in any of the telehealth providers listed on this site beyond the commission-per-referral relationships disclosed above. If that ever changes, we’ll say so on this page and on the specific provider review.
Questions, corrections, tips
We welcome them. Reach the editorial team at editorial@theglpreport.com. Significant corrections are noted at the bottom of the affected page.